🔗 Share this article

Russia's monetary authority has announced it is pursuing compensation valued at $230 billion against the securities depository Euroclear. This legal step represents a clear warning by the Kremlin against proposals to utilize frozen Russian state funds to aid Ukraine.

The Substantial Demand

Based on accounts in Russian state media, the central bank filed a lawsuit last week for an estimated 18 trillion roubles. This figure is equivalent to the aforementioned $230 billion demand.

European Union officials are set to determine later this week regarding a proposal to use approximately €210 billion in frozen Russian state funds. The proposal entails granting Ukraine with a substantial loan to finance its military and economic stability.

The vast majority of these assets, totaling €185 billion, are stored at the Euroclear clearing house in Brussels. Euroclear acts as the primary custodian for the Kremlin's frozen financial reserves.

A Clash Over Legality

EU officials have maintained that their plan is on solid legal ground. They argue rests on the fact that ownership of the sovereign wealth remains with Russia, despite being it was frozen in European jurisdictions shortly after the 2022 invasion of Ukraine.

The Russian government, however, has labeled any use of the assets as illegal appropriation. It has threatened reciprocal measures, such as confiscating EU corporate holdings within Russia.

The head of Russia's sovereign wealth fund, who has taken on a prominent position in peace negotiations, stated on a social media platform that Russia "will prevail in court" and retrieve its funds. He added that the European Union, the euro, and Euroclear "will suffer" from the proposal.

Wider Implications

In comments interpreted as an attempt to drive a wedge between Europe and the United States, Dmitriev described the assets plan as "a vicious attack on the right to ownership and the international reserves system established by the United States."

Euroclear refused to comment on the new lawsuit. The institution has previously stated it is contending with more than 100 lawsuits in Russian jurisdictions.

Legal Hurdles Ahead

While courts in EU countries are unlikely to enforce rulings from Russian tribunals, experts expect Moscow to seek enforcement in nations with stronger relations to the Kremlin.

"Russian monetary authorities may attempt to enforce a Russian legal ruling against Euroclear in countries such as China, Hong Kong, the UAE, Kazakhstan, and other friendly states, if relevant assets can be located," commented a lawyer from an NSP law firm.

EU Countermeasures

EU officials indicated they are working on measures to discourage other countries from aiding any Russian legal action against EU companies. Additionally, they are designing protections to shield EU member states with investments in Russia from what they call "illegal expropriation."

The Proposed Loan Mechanism

Under the complex plan, the EU would provide an initial €90 billion loan to Ukraine, backed by the cash earned from the frozen assets at Euroclear. Importantly, Russia's legal claim on the principal funds would remain untouched.

Ukraine would only be obligated to repay the loan if and when Russia consented to pay compensation for the immense destruction caused during the ongoing war.

Other Funding Ideas

The Belgian government, supported by Italy, Bulgaria, and Malta, has urged the EU to consider an different approach for funding Ukraine. This entails common EU debt issuance to secure a loan, using unallocated funds within the European budget.

Such a proposal, however, requires unanimity among all 27 member states. Hungary's government, viewed as aligned with the Kremlin, has already signaled its objection.

Commenting on Monday, the EU foreign policy chief, Kaja Kallas, described the reparations loan as "the strongest solution" for aiding Ukraine. "The reparations loan is based on the Russian immobilized funds, which means it doesn't come from our taxpayers' money, which is also important," she remarked. "Furthermore, it delivers a powerful message that if you cause all this damage to another country, you have to pay for the rebuilding."